My fellow teachers of College Algebra. I want to talk to you today about domain and range. For now, let’s leave aside all the analogies, vending machines, notation and ants crawling on graphs. Let’s get to the heart of the matter with an assessment/instructional task.

This is in the spirit of Eric Mazur, but it is low-technology. It will take 10 minutes. Then you’ll need to report your results back to me. We can talk about what those results mean.

Here is what you do.

Get yourself a College Algebra class that has studying (or even one that is still studying) domain and range.

Then get yourself some index cards in two colors. We used yellow and pink. You may use whatever you have on hand. Make clear that yellow means *yes*, and that pink means *no*.

Also make clear that they will raise their cards in unison and on the count of 3. This is to prevent conforming to the majority and will result in more honest representations of your students’ understanding.

Practice this routine on some non-mathematical questions. Some that will be universal *nos*, some universal *yeses*, some that are mixed.

Now have your students consider the function , where *x* is interpreted as the input, and *y* as the output in the usual way. You are going to ask a series of questions about the range of this function.

**Ask,** *Is 4 in the range of this function?*

You should get near universal yellow. Ask someone to state the case and make a note of their argument on the board.

**Ask,** *Is –2 in the range of this function?*

My bet is that you’ll have a lot of pinks, but several yellows. Those yellows probably need clarification that we are asking about range, not domain. But don’t assume it. Ask the pinks to state their case. Ask the yellows to refute or question. Never say anything a [student] can say.

Likely, the yellows will argue that there is no number that, when squared, gives -2. They mean *real number*; I see no need to make a big deal out of this. But make a note of the argument. Perhaps writing something like this on the board:

nothing

You will probably need to revisit this later on.

**Ask,** *Is in the range of this function?*

This is probably all yellow and mostly unproblematic.

Now the fun begins.

**Ask,** *Is π in the range of this function?*

If you don’t get a good mix of yellow and pink here, I will eat my hat. And those pink people? They are going to tell you that there is nothing that—when squared—gives π.

Have them talk it out in pairs or threes. Then have them show cards again. And then have the pinks state their case. Nine times out of ten, it’s going to be that *there is no number that can be squared to get π*.

My fellow College Algebra teachers, I am not interested in your theoretical arguments about what a fabulous job you/your textbook/your online homework platform are doing at teaching domain and range. If you wish to claim that your students will not show pink for π here, the burden of proof on you is high.

Notice with your students the very important difference between:

nothing

and

nothing I can think of

Someone will point out that is a number, and that when you square it you get π. Highlight that contribution and estimate the value of this number.

**Ask,** *Is 0 in the range of this function? *

Probably mostly yellow, but worth asking to make sure.

**Ask,** *Is infinity in the range of this function?*

Seriously. If you don’t get, like, 80% yellow here then I do not understand your school’s placement system

Reinforce that infinity is not a number. Connect it to the notation and wrap up with one more.

**Ask**, *Is 12 in the range of this function?*

You should get nearly all yellow here. Get back to your regularly scheduled classroom activities.

Then report and discuss your results with colleagues, on Twitter, on your blog and here.

## Update

There is lots of unexpected pushback in the comments on the value of teaching domain, range and functions in a College Algebra course. I had previously thought these to be de rigueur topics in such a course. I suspect sampling bias here.

**Gregory Taylor** mostly reproduced my results in his own course and had some lovely mathematical conversations along the way. You should go read his account.