If you assume that Double Stuf Oreos are doubly stuffed (which may turn out to be false), then using the Nutrition Facts labels, you can write the following system of equations, where *x* represents the number of calories in one wafer and *y* represents the number of calories in a single layer of stuf.

The first line represents the caloric content of a single serving (three cookies) of Regular Oreos; the second line represents the caloric content of a single serving (two cookies) of Double Stuf Oreos.

Getting to this system represents some effort on the part of me and my College Algebra students. They are wont to represent their work arithmetically; my job is to help them to transition this arithmetic problem solving to algebraic generality. It is work that I love, but it is hard work.

We had gotten ourselves there, and we had discussed the importance of being very clear about the meanings of our variables when I presented the following graph in class yesterday.

The basic questions in front of us were, *What does the blue line represent? What does the red line represent? What is the meaning of this graph?*

We had a number of false starts and hesitations. After a few minutes of this, a student pointed our attention to the slope of the red line.

**Student:** The slope is –2.

**Me:** Why is it negative?

**Student:** Because it goes down.

**Student:** Because if you count the squares over and the squares down, and write rise over run, it’s negative 2, which means the line goes down.

**Me:** Right. But what does that have to do with Oreos?

A few moments of contemplative silence from 44 college students.

**Student:** There are twice as many wafers as stufs in the regular Oreos, and the red line represents the regular Oreos.

**Me:** Right. But why **negative**?

A few more moments of contemplative silence from the group. This is not a routine they are familiar with, but they are working hard to acculturate themselves to these new expectations.

**Me:** OK. Let’s do this. Write your answer to this question in your notes.”What is the meaning of **x** on this graph?”

I allow a few moments for this to occur.

**Me:** Raise your hand if you wrote that “x represents wafers”.

About 80% of hands go up. I contemplate this. Then…

**Student:** Isn’t it “number of calories in one wafer”?

Now we have something to work with!

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

My views about these geometric solutions to algebraic problems have evolved over the years. I guess my natural approach to the specific problem you’ve posed here isn’t really geometric, so that’s part of the bias.

However, as I said, my views are evolving. This AoPS video showing the solution to the 2013 AMC 12A problem #25 really shows the power of a geometric approach in the setting of a really difficult problem. (warning – 20 min long, but so worth it):

http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Videos/external.php?video_id=365

Also, by coincidence, just yesterday I received a copy of MIT’s magazine “Technology Review.” The last couple of pages always includes some great problems and puzzles. This issue had the following question:

Show that the solutions to e^z = (z – 1) / (z + 1) all lie on the imaginary axis.

This is another problem where the picture is worth 1000 words, or whatever the math equivalent statement would be!

Hopefully the geometric approach to the Oreo problem was fun for your students.

I want to retake “College Algebra” with Christopher! …contemplating my future grandchildren going to college where ever you are teaching…

Pingback: Math Teachers at Play #66 | Let's Play Math!