Hung-Hsi Wu, professor emeritus of mathematics at Berkeley, has a new article in *American Educator*. He addresses the new Common Core State Standards. His metaphor is of a phoenix rising from the ashes. Yeah, CCSSM is *that *good, and everything else that has been happening in mathematics education is *that* bad.

I do not exaggerate.

The article is long (11 pages, including 3 sidebars-all his). Aspects of his argument require a certain amount of mathematical sophistication (which is sort of his point). Therefore, in the service of those with less patience than I possess, I will spend the week sharing some key nuggets from the article. Each nugget will be accompanied by my own (possibly imperfect) translation.

Shall we begin?

### Wu on the role of standards in K—12 mathematics:

[T]he prevailing dogma in mathematics education is that the main purpose of a set of standards is either to pick and choose from a collection of tried-and-true topics…and organize the selected items judiciously, or to vary the pedagogical approaches to these topics. (p. 4)

### WHat i think he’s saying

The sum total of

allefforts in standards-based mathematics education (since Plato presumably, and with the possible exception of American high school geometry) has been a grand exercise in rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. But Common Core will be different. (High school geometry, we will see later on, may have had its deck chairs rearranged, but the boat is sailing along quite nicely.)

Christopher,

I am so glad you linked to this in a recent twitter post. Your TMWYK posts have consistently intrigued me and helped me move forward as a novice teacher of low level high school math. However, I feel like this is moving me toward the motherlode! I can’t even begin to digest Wu’s article and its place in the web of math pedagogy that is evident in the #MTBoS. It feels kind of like looking at the sky on a clear, crisp night, seeing all the stars and suddenly it all clicks into place and I’m in space and part of space. Yeah, like that.

Thank you.

I am glad to hear the writing here resonated with you,

mslcbillings. It takes quite a different tone from the Talking Math with Your Kids work, doesn’t it?I would be interested to hear sometime—perhaps over a cup of coffee—about that moment you describe of things clicking into place.

How would you like that conversation? 140? Blogosphere? Tweetup? (I think I’m too far away for that), or some other way? If it’s morning coffee, it will have to be a weekend.

Leslie (@leslie_su76)