More junk food math

You’ve seen the billboards for these, right?

Basically, they’re mini McNuggets.

McNuggets have a lot of fat. Most of it (as with all fried foods with the possible exception of cheese curds) is in the outer coating.

So what happens when we shrink the McNugget?

We could model the chicken by volume and the outer coating by surface area. In this case, shrinking the McNugget by a factor 1/2 would yield a doubling of the ratio of coating to chicken. As a result we predict a substantial increase in fat as a percentage of weight.

But that’s a crude model-the coating isn’t infinitely thin.

A more realistic model might treat the coating as having a thickness, and thus a volume. When we shrink the McNugget to make a McBite, do we shrink the thickness of the coating proportionately? This seems unlikely. But even if we do, the ratio of coating to chicken increases.

More likely is that the coating is of constant thickness. In other words, McBites are probably smaller chicken bits covered with the same coating as McNuggets. Once again, we increase the ratio of coating to chicken, and we predict a substantial increase in fat as a percentage of weight.

Heading over to McDonald’s online Nutrition Information, we learn that McNuggets have about 12 grams of fat for a 65 gram serving. That’s about 18% fat by weight. This figure is consistent across serving sizes.

Mc Bites? 19 grams of fat for an 85 gram serving. That’s about 22% fat by weight. Also consistent across serving sizes.

How different is 22% fat from 18% fat, you ask? Very different. They’re both bad news, but 22% fat is (coincidentally) 22% more fat than 18% is. So take a serving of McNuggets, which has a lot of fat. And put almost a quarter more fat in. That’s McBites. Oh, and also increase the portion size from 97 grams (6 piece McNuggets) to 128 grams (Regular size McBites).

Middle school math will get you far, kids.

Now if we can get an estimate of the McNugget to McBite scale factor, we can set up a system of equations and figure out just how much of that fat is in the coating.

About these ads

4 responses to “More junk food math

  1. Thank you. I don’t do McDonald’s, but my son does (when with other adults). I’ll request from the other adults that they not get this new product for him. And I’ll request that his mini-school discuss this in relation to their theme last month, which included info on junk food. Yuck!

  2. It’s hard, though, to ask him not to taste the ‘delights’ our culture has to offer. I wonder if there’s any way to get them to take this back?

  3. As a fervent lover of McNuggets and, now, McBites, I’ll tell you right away that it’s going to be tough to find a reliable Nugget:Bite scale factor. Based on more samples than I’d care to admit to, the McBite variance has to be too large to define any kind of standard, Platonic Bite. The average Bite serving contains pieces ranging from almost-Nugget-sized to almost-proton-sized.

    And, really, do we have to go down the calorie road again? Am I going to have to borrow another scale?

  4. Another reason NOT to eat them, not that I needed one. Blech!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s